|
|
THE PROCESS AND MECHANISM OF MULTIPLE ACTORS PROMOTING RURAL SPECIALIZED MULTIFUNCTIONAL TRANSITION FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF BEYOND NEO-ENDOGENOUS DEVELOPMENT: A CASE STUDY OF SHE VILLAGE IN NANJING |
LI Ting-yun1, ZHANG Xiao-lin1,2, HU Xiao-liang1, LIU Hong-bo1, HAO Jia-qi1 |
1. School of Geography, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China; 2. Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application, Nanjing 210023, China |
|
|
Abstract Discussions on the promotion of multifunctional village transformation guided by Western neoendogenous development theory are increasing. Drawing on reflections regarding the local applicability of neo-endogenous development theory in China, this article proposes a concept that transcends neoendogenous development and presents a case study of She Village in Nanjing's Jiangning District. It empirically examines the process and mechanisms of characteristic multifunctional transformation in villages through the participation of multiple actors, employing field surveys and actor-network analysis. The findings indicate that: 1) there are fundamental differences in the roles of the state and local actors between China and the West, rendering Western neo-endogenous development theory inapplicable to the research and practice of rural development in China; 2) Beyond the neo-endogenous development involves a combination of national top-level design guidance and local independent exploration. 3) The case study village has experienced a multifunctional transformation process, evolving from a single focus on farmers' living accommodation and production security to the integration of rural living and ecological characteristics. 4) The case villages is a dynamic development led by the government, wherein the resources and functions of rural characteristics are progressively enhanced.
|
Received: 08 February 2024
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2025.02.014
E-mail: xiaolin-zh@163.com。
|
|
|
|
[1] |
胡书玲,余斌,王明杰.乡村重构与转型:西方经验及启示[J].地理研究,2019,38(12):2833-2845.[Hu Shuling, Yu Bin, Wang Mingjie. Rural restructuring and transformation:Western experience and its enlightenment to China[J]. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(12):2833-2845.]
|
[2] |
Halfacree K. Rural space:Constructing a three-fold architecture[M]//Cloke P, Marsden T, Mooney P. Handbook of Rural Studies. London:Sage, 2006:2-29.
|
[3] |
Wilson G A. From productivism to post-productivism…and back again?Exploring the (un) changed natural and mental landscapes of European agriculture[J]. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2001,26(1):77-102.
|
[4] |
Renting H, Rossing W A H, Groot J C J, et al. Exploring multifunctional agriculture. A review of conceptual approaches and prospects for an integrative transitional framework[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2009,90:112-113.
|
[5] |
Holmes J. Impulses towards a multifunctional transition in rural Australia:Gaps in the research agenda[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2006,22:142-160.
|
[6] |
Pinto-Correia T, Breman B. New roles for farming in a differentiated countryside:The Portuguese example[J]. Regional Environmental Change, 2008,9(3):143-152.
|
[7] |
Holmes J. Cape York Peninsula, Australia:A frontier region undergoing a multifunctional transition with indigenous engagement[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2012,28(3):252-265.
|
[8] |
Song B J, Robinson G M, et al. Multifunctional agriculture in a periurban fringe:Chinese farmers'responses to shifts in policy and changing socio-economic conditions[J]. Land Use Policy, 2023,133:106869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106869.
|
[9] |
Evans N. Multifunctional agriculture:A transition theory perspective[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2010,26(1):81-82.
|
[10] |
Potter C, Burney J. Agricultural multifunctionality in the WTO:Legitimate non-trade concern or disguised protectionism?[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2002,18(1):35-47.
|
[11] |
Claudia B, Jeff H, Anna M. Institutional support for building resilience within rural communities characterised by multifunctional land use[J]. Land Use Policy, 2023, 132:106808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106808.
|
[12] |
Daugstad K, Ronningen K, Skar B. Agriculture as an upholder of cultural heritage?Conceptualizations and value judgements:A Norwegian perspective in international context[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2006,22(1):67-81.
|
[13] |
文军,吴越菲.流失"村民"的村落:传统村落的转型及其乡村性反思——基于15个典型村落的经验研究[J].社会学研究,2017,32(4):22-45,242-243.[Wen Jun, Wu Feiyue. Villages with a loss of villagers:The transformation of the traditional villages and reflections on rurality[J]. Sociological Studies, 2017, 32(4):22-45, 242-243.]
|
[14] |
陈水映,梁学成,余东丰,等.传统村落向旅游特色小镇转型的驱动因素研究——以陕西袁家村为例[J].旅游学刊,2020,35(7):73-85.[Chen Shuiyin, Liang Xuecheng, Yu Dongfeng, et al. On the driving factors of the transformation from traditional village to tourism town:A case study of Yuanjiacun village in Shaanxi[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2020,35(7):73-85.]
|
[15] |
陈燕纯,杨忍,王敏.基于行动者网络和共享经济视角的乡村民宿发展及空间重构——以深圳官湖村为例[J].地理科学进展,2018,37(5):718-730.[Chen Yanchun, Yang Ren, Wang Min. Development process of rural homestay tourism and spatial restructuring with the actornetwork method from the perspective of shared economy:A case study of Guanhu village in Shenzhen[J]. Progress in Geography, 2018,37(5):718-730.]
|
[16] |
李庭筠,罗邱戈,张金萍,等.基于扎根理论的琼北火山地区传统村落新业态发展探讨——以海口市美孝村为例[J].自然资源学报,2020, 35(9):2079-2091.[Li Tingyun, Luo Qiuge, Zang Jinping, et al. Research on development of new business forms for traditional villages in Northern Hainan volcano area based on the Grounded Theory:Taking Meixiao village in Haikou as a case[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020,35(9):2079-2091.]
|
[17] |
李平星,陈雯,孙伟.经济发达地区乡村地域多功能空间分异及影响因素——以江苏省为例[J].地理学报,2014,69(6):797-807.[Li Pingxing, Chen Wen, Sun Wei. Spatial differentiation and influencing factors of rural territorial multifunctions in developed regions:A case study of Jiangsu province[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(6):797-807.]
|
[18] |
刘玉,刘彦随,郭丽英.乡村地域多功能的内涵及其政策启示[J].人文地理,2011,26(6):103-106,132.[Liu Yu, Liu Yansui, Guo Liying. Connotations of rural regional multifunction and its policy implications in China[J]. Human Geography, 2011,26(6):103-106,132.]
|
[19] |
杨忍,刘彦随,龙花楼,等.中国乡村转型重构研究进展与展望——逻辑主线与内容框架[J].地理科学进展,2015,34(8):1019-1030.[Yang Ren, Liu Yansui, Long Hualou, et al. Research progress and prospect of rural transformation and reconstruction in China:Paradigms and main content[J]. Progress in Geography, 2015, 34(8):1019-1030.]
|
[20] |
张小林.乡村空间系统及其演变研究[M].南京:南京师范大学出版社,1999:268-270.[Zhang Xiaolin. Research on Rural Space System and Its Evolution:A Case of Southern Jiangsu Province[M]. Nanjing:Nanjing Normal University Press, 1999:268-270.]
|
[21] |
Liu Yansui, Liu Yu, Cheng Yufu, et al. The process and driving forces of rural hollowing in China under rapid urbanization[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2010,20(6):876-888.
|
[22] |
高慧智,张京祥,罗震东.复兴还是异化?消费文化驱动下的大都市边缘乡村空间转型——对高淳国际慢城大山村的实证观察[J].国际城市规划,2014,29(1):68-73.[Gao Huizhi, Zhang Jingxiang, Luo Zhendong. Renaissance or alienation?Spatial transformation of rural space of metropolis fringe area driven by consumer culture:Empirical observation on Dashan village of Gaochun international slow city[J]. Urban Planning International, 2014,29(1):68-73.]
|
[23] |
刘祖云,刘传俊.后生产主义乡村:乡村振兴的一个理论视角[J].中国农村观察,2018(5):2-13.[Liu Zuyun, Liu Chuanjun. The postproductivist countryside:A theoretical perspective of rural revitalization[J]. China Rural Survey, 2018(5):2-13.]
|
[24] |
房艳刚,刘继生.基于多功能理论的中国乡村发展多元化探讨——超越"现代化"发展范式[J].地理学报,2015,70(2):257-270.[Fang Yangang, Liu Jisheng. Diversified agriculture and rural development in China based on multifunction theory:Beyond modernization paradigm[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015,70(2):257-270.]
|
[25] |
刘彦随,刘玉,陈玉福.中国地域多功能性评价及其决策机制[J].地理学报,2011,66(10):1379-1389.[Liu Yansui, Liu Yu, Chen Yufu. Territorial multi-functionality evaluation and decision-making mechanism at county scale in China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2011,66(10):1379-1389.]
|
[26] |
徐凯,房艳刚.乡村地域多功能空间分异特征及类型识别——以辽宁省78个区县为例[J].地理研究,2019,38(3):482-495.[Xu Kai, Fang Yangang. Spatial differentiation and type identification of rural territorial multi-functions in Liaoning province[J]. Geographical Research, 2019,38(3):482-495.]
|
[27] |
江燕玲,潘卓,潘美含.农用地多功能视角下乡村旅游运营模式引导决策研究——基于重庆城郊25个行政村的调查分析[J].人文地理,2017,32(5):147-153.[Jiang Yanling, Pan Zhuo, Pan Meihan. Research on guide decision of operation mode of rural tourism from the perspective of multi-function of tourism from the perspective of multi-function of agricultural land:Based on an investigation analysis agricultural of 25 administrative villages in suburb of Chongqing[J]. Human Geography, 2017,32(5):147-153.]
|
[28] |
谷晓坤,李小天,许德娅,等.大城市居民对周边乡村多功能转型的响应——基于"知识-态度-行为"(KAP)模型的分析[J].地理研究,2023,42(6):1598-1612.[Gu Xiaokun, Li Xiaotian, Xu Deya, et al. Responses of urban residents to rural multifunctional transition in the peri-urban areas:Analysis based on the"knowledgeattitude-behavior "(KAP) model[J]. Geographical Research, 2023, 42(6):1598-1612.]
|
[29] |
马历,龙花楼,屠爽爽,等.基于乡村多功能理论的贫困村域演变特征与振兴路径探讨——以海南省什寒村为例[J].地理科学进展, 2019,38(9):1435-1446.[Ma Li, Long Hualou, Tu Shuangshuang, et al. Characteristics of change and vitalization pathways of poor villages based on multifunctional rural development theory:A case study of Zahan village in Hainan province[J]. Progress in Geography, 2019,38(9):1435-1446.]
|
[30] |
陈秧分,黄修杰,王丽娟.多功能理论视角下的中国乡村振兴与评估[J].中国农业资源与区划,2018,39(6):201-209.[Chen Yangfen, Huang Xiujie, Wang Lijuan. China's rural revitalization and its evaluation from the perspective of multifunctional theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2018,39(6):201-209.]
|
[31] |
李伯华,周璐,窦银娣,等.基于乡村多功能理论的少数民族传统聚落景观风貌演化特征及影响机制研究——以湖南怀化皇都村为例[J].地理科学,2022,42(8):1433-1445.[Li Bohua, Zhou Lu, Dou Yindi, et al. Evolution characteristics and influence mechanism of ethnic traditional settlement landscape based on rural multifunctional theory:A case study of Huangdu village in Huaihua city, Hunan[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2022,42(8):1433-1445.]
|
[32] |
甄雨,马晓冬,孙昕哲.村域尺度的城郊乡村多功能演化与发展路径——以徐州市铜山区为例[J].地理科学进展,2024,43(3):446-457.[Zhen Yu, Ma Xiaodong, Sun Xinzhe. Multi-function evolution and development path of suburban villages at village scale:A case study of Tongshan district, Xuzhou city[J]. Progress in Geography, 2024,43(3):446-457.]
|
[33] |
杨忍,罗秀丽,陈燕纯.中国县域乡村地域多功能格局及影响因素识别[J].地理科学进展,2019,38(9):1316-1328.[Yang Ren, Luo Xiuli, Chen Yanchun. Spatial pattern and influencing factors of rural multifunctionality at county level in China[J]. Progress in Geography, 2019,38(9):1316-1328.]
|
[34] |
李平星,陈诚,陈江龙.乡村地域多功能时空格局演变及影响因素研究——以江苏省为例[J].地理科学,2015,35(7):845-851.[Li Pingxing, Chen Cheng, Chen Jianglong. Temporal evolution and spatial differentiation of rural territorial multifunctions and the influencing factors:The case of Jiangsu province[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2015,35(7):845-851.]
|
[35] |
Yang W, Li W, Wang L C. How should rural development be chosen?The mechanism narration of rural regional function:A case study of Gansu province, China[J]. Heliyon, 2023,9(10). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20485.
|
[36] |
张城国.欧盟的农村发展实践——以LEADER系列计划为例[J].世界农业, 2011(8):10-15.[Zhang Chengguo. Rural development practices in the EU:The example of the LEADER series of programs[J]. World Agriculture, 2011(8):10-15.]
|
[37] |
Prusa J, Konecny O, Hrabak J, et al. Beyond the story of the LEADER projects:Are organic farmers actors of multifunctionality and rural development?[J]. Land Use Policy, 2022, 166:106046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106046.
|
[38] |
Kostyaev A I. Rural areas of Russia's north-west borderland:Problems and development path[J]. Baltic Region, 2019,11(4):93-113.
|
[39] |
王兰.新内生发展理论视角下的乡村振兴实践——以大兴安岭南麓集中连片特困区为例[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版),2020,20(4):65-74.[Wang Lan. The practice of rural revitalization under the new endogenous development theory:Taking the contiguous and extremely poor area in the south foot of the greater Xing An mountains as an example[J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University (Social Science Edition), 2020,20(4):65-74.]
|
[40] |
何登录.新内生式发展理论视角下贫困治理与乡村振兴的协同推进:辩证逻辑、分析框架、推进路径[J].传承,2022(3):112-117.[He Denglu. Synergistic promotion of poverty governance and rural revitalization from the perspective of new endogenous development theory:Dialectical logic, analytical framework, and path of promotion[J]. Inheritance&Innovation, 2022(3):112-117.]
|
[41] |
闫宇,汪江华,张玉坤.新内生式发展理论对我国乡村振兴的启示与拓展研究[J].城市发展研究,2021,28(7):19-23.[Yan Yu, Wang Jianghua, Zhang Yukun. Study on the enlightenment and extension of" New Endogenous"development theory to China's rural revitalization[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2021,28(7):19-23.]
|
[42] |
Lowe P, Ray C, Ward N, et al. Participation in Rural Development:A Review of European Experience[M]. England:Centre for Rural Economy, University of Newcastle, 1998:5-15.
|
[43] |
Woods M. New directions in rural studies?[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2012,28(1):1-4.
|
[44] |
Cejudo E, Editors F N, Dawis R A, et al. Neo-endogenous Development in European Rural Areas[M]. Berlin:Springer, 2020:301-304.
|
[45] |
吴越菲.从部门生产到区域繁荣:面向农村新内生发展的政策转型及其反思[J].贵州社会科学,2022(5):158-168.[Wu Feiyue. From sectoral production to regional prosperity:Policy transformation toward new endogenous rural development and its rethinking[J]. Guizhou Social Sciences, 2022(5):158-168.]
|
[46] |
Shucksmith M. Disintegrated rural development?Neo-endogenous rural development, planning and place-shaping in diffused power contexts[J]. Sociologia Ruralis, 2010,50(1):1-14.
|
[47] |
Ray C. Culture Economies:A Perspective on Local Rural Development in Europe[M]. Newcastle, England:Centre for Rural Economy, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, 2001:25-36.
|
[48] |
Scott M, Gallent N, Gkartzios M. The Routledge Companion to Rural Planning[M]. London:Routledge, 2019:159-169.
|
[49] |
Lucas O, Mary O. Community-based social enterprises as actors for neo-endogenous rural development:A multi-stakeholder approach[J]. Sociologia Ruralis, 2022,87(4):1191-1218.
|
[50] |
Qu M, Zollet S. Neo-endogenous revitalisation:Enhancing community resilience through art tourism and rural entrepreneurship[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2023,97:105-114.
|
[51] |
Thomas D, Wibke S, James K, et al. The Leader programme 2007-2013:Enabling or disabling social innovation and neo-endogenous development?Insights from Austria and Ireland[J]. European Urban and Regional Studies, 2016,23(1):56-68.
|
[52] |
Angelo B, Alberto S, Marco V, et al. Neo-endogenous rural development in favor of organic farming:Two case studies from Italian fragile areas[J]. European Countryside, 2020,12(1):1-29.
|
[53] |
赵海涛,李梓恒,刘书睿.乡村振兴视域下新内生式发展理论的解释——以北京市平谷区T村为例[J].安徽农学通报,2019,25(13):10-14, 35.[Zhao Haitao, Li Ziheng, Liu Shurui. Interpretation of new endogenous development theory from the perspective of rural revitalization strategy:Take T village in Pinggu district as an example[J]. Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019,25(13):10-14,35.]
|
[54] |
杨锦秀,刘敏,尚凭,等.如何破解乡村振兴的内外联动而"内"不动:基于成都市蒲江县箭塔村的实践考察[J].农业经济问题,2023(3):51-61.[Yang Jinxiu, Liu Ming, Shang Pin, et al. How to crack the weak internal participation in rural revitalization:Based on the practice investigation of Jianta village, Pujiang county, Chengdu[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2023(3):51-61.]
|
[55] |
吴茂英,张镁琦,王龙杰.共生视角下乡村新内生式发展的路径与机制——以杭州临安区乡村运营为例[J].自然资源学报,2023,38(8):2097-2116.[Wu Maoying, Zhang Meiqi, Wang Longjie. The path and mechanism of neo-endogenous rural development from the perspective of symbiosis:A case study of rural operation in Lin'an district, Hangzhou[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2023,38(8):2097-2116.]
|
[56] |
Latour B. Reassembling the Social:An Introduction to Actor Network Theory[M]. New York, USA:Oxford University Press, 2005:15-37.
|
[57] |
胡晓亮,李红波,张小林,等.发达地区乡村空间商品化的过程与机制解析——以苏州市西巷村为例[J].地理科学进展,2021,40(1):171-182.[Hu Xiaoliang, Li Hongbo, Zhang Xiaolin, et al. Process and mechanism of the commodification of rural space in developed areas:A case study of Xixiang village in Suzhou city[J]. Progress in Geography, 2021,40(1):171-182.]
|
[58] |
李伯华,陈新新,窦银娣,等.行动者网络视角下传统村落空间治理研究——以湖南省岳阳市张谷英村为例[J].地理科学,2023,43(7):1154-1166.[Li Bohua, Chen Xinxin, Dou Yindi, et al. Space governance of the traditional settlement based on the perspective of actornetwork:Taking Zhangguying village as case study[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2023,43(7):1154-1166.]
|
[59] |
艾少伟,苗长虹.从"地方空间"、"流动空间"到"行动者网络空间":ANT视角[J].人文地理,2010,25(2):43-49.[Ai Shaowei, Miao Changhong. "Space of places", "space of flows "and" space of actor-networks":From the perspective of ANT[J]. Human Geography, 2010,25(2):43-49.]
|
[60] |
Murdoch J. Networks:A new paradigm of rural development?[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2000,16(4):407-419.
|
[61] |
王伟,乔家君,程遂营,等.基于行动者网络理论的重渡旅游专业村集聚演化机制[J].人文地理,2023,38(2):155-163,180.[Wang Wei, Qiao Jiajun, Cheng Suiyin, et al. An analysis of the evolution mechanism of Chongdu tourism village cluster based on the theory of actor network[J]. Human Geography, 2023,38(2):155-163,180.]
|
[62] |
Williams C C. A critical evaluation of the commodification thesis[J]. The Sociological Review, 2002,50(4):525-542.
|
[64] |
Smithers J, Joseph A E, Armstrong M. Across the divide (?):Reconciling farm and town views of agriculture-community linkages[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2005,21(3):281-295.
|
[65] |
吴晓燕,赵普兵.协同共治:乡村振兴中的政府、市场与农村社会[J].云南大学学报(社会科学版),2019,18(5):121-128.[Wu Xiaoyan, Zhao Pubing. Collaborative governance:Government, market and rural society in the process of rural revitalization[J]. Journal of Yunnan University, 2019,18(5):121-128.]
|
|
|
|